For engineering and IT leaders taking a team through AIYour AI plan has a people problem nobody put on the roadmap.Your AI plan has a people problem nobody put on the roadmap.AI adoption is not just speed. It’s the context.Your engineers aren’t learning a new tool. They’re learning a new job.
Going deep in one codebase used to be the job. Now it’s orchestrating across teams, agents and decisions, and judging what to hand to AI and what to keep. It takes a different mindset, and skills your team was never trained for.
We start with one honest conversation about the hopes and fears, and turn it into the skills your team needs next.
Fear: I’m losing my skills. AI is the one who codes.
Hope: We can do at least 30% more
real notes from Matej’s engineers
When your team holds back on AI,it looks like resistance. What’s really underneath it?
MatejEngineering manager
The pressure from above was clear: use AI in every project, scale without adding people, 30% more output this year, at the same quality. Underneath, people were asking questions nobody had put on the roadmap:
Are we losing the craft we built our careers on?
Is my job replaceable by an AI agent?
What becomes of us then?
William Bridges’ transition model. A new tool can land in a day; learning the new job it brings takes months. The red line is productivity: it often dips through the ending and the neutral zone, then recovers, often above where it started. A concept, not to scale.
IreneMental fitness coach, trainer, speaker
From the outside it all looks the same: pushback in meetings, tools nobody opens, a polite “it’s not ready yet”. Underneath, it can be many things. Fear for the job. Missing work they were proud of. Not knowing what’s expected of them now. Or a real risk they’ve spotted: tech debt that can explode, control over the code that can slip.
You can’t tell which from the outside, and pushing harder won’t tell you either. When people can say it out loud, you find out what’s really there, and which fears to act on. And if you’re the one leading people through it, you’re probably carrying some of it too.
From the two of us, starting with the blueprint. The first three each give you one thing to use with your team. The last one helps you pick your next step. That’s all.
Inboxone a week
Matej & IreneEmail 1: the blueprint— the signals, the setup, the session itself, and keeping it aliveWeek 1
Irene & MatejEmail 2: make sense of the fears— a one-page guide for after the session: the four pathways, the strength and saboteur in each, and what you do as their leaderWeek 2
Irene & MatejEmail 3: you, and the part you play in all this— your own fears and saboteurs, like the Judge and the Hyper-Achiever, and a short quiz to find yoursWeek 3
Matej & IreneEmail 4: turn the fears into action— find where you are, one step for this week, and how we can helpWeek 4
Get it by emailfree
so this becomes something you do, not just a page you read.
Who we are
MatejSenior engineering manager
Matej Strašek leads the engineering teams behind operations at Exoticca, a travel tech company: everything after a customer books a trip, until they’re back home. This year he took about 12 engineers through AI adoption, and worked out what it meant for his own role along the way.
Irene Anggreeni, PhD, is a mental fitness coach, trainer and TEDx speaker, and a former software engineer. She works with engineering leaders and their teams to build burnout-proof, high-performing cultures. As Matej’s mentor on this AI adoption journey, she brings a deeper understanding of the human side of that change, and hands-on tools to work with it.
Why do good teams hold back on AI? An engineering manager and a mental fitness coach answer from both sides, and your audience leaves with one thing to try on Monday. Tell us what you have in mind, and let’s check if we’re a fit to work together.